1. The defendant,

A. As to Plaintiff A and C, each of KRW 5,00,000, KRW 8,000,000, and each of the above amounts to Plaintiff B, respectively.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties 1) The defendant is the defendant's farm "G farm" (hereinafter "the defendant's farm") on the two parcels outside Sejong Special Self-Governing City F.

(2) Plaintiff A is a person who operates a two-way farm under his trade name. (2) Plaintiff A is the trade name of “I farm” from Pocheon-si H; Plaintiff B is the trade name of “K farm”; Plaintiff C is the trade name of “M farm”; Plaintiff C is the trade name of “M farm” from Nam-si L from Nam-si, Namyang-si; Plaintiff D operates a two-way farm under the trade name of “ Q farm.”

B. On January 7, 2015, an order to restrict the movement of pigs was issued on the “T farm” in the “T farm,” to operate S with approximately 400 meters away from the Defendant farm. (ii) Sejong Special Self-Governing City Mayor issued an order to restrict the movement of pigs of a farm, including Defendant farm, within three kilometers from the center of the “T farm” (hereinafter referred to as “order to restrict the movement of pigs in this case”).

3) 피고는 이 사건 이동제한명령 이후 피고 농장에서 자돈(仔豚)을 출하할 수 없어 농장 운영에 막대한 지장이 발생한다는 이유로 세종특별자치시에 여러 차례에 걸쳐 ‘이동제한명령의 해제 또는 예방적 살처분’을 요청하였는데, 세종특별자치시 소속 공무원으로부터 ‘예방적 살처분은 불가하고, 이동제한명령은 피고 농장의 돼지들이 예방접종을 받고 항원검사 결과 음성이 나오면 동일 시ㆍ도 내에서 이동은 가능하다’는 답변을 들었다. 4) 한편 농림축산식품부장관은 2015. 1. 16. 세종특별자치시장을 비롯한 광역자치단체장 등에게 ‘구제역 발생에 따른 이동제한 농장 해제기준 시달’이라는 제목으로 아래와 같은 내용이 포함된 공문을 발송하였다. 가.

A farm where restrictions on movement are to be cancelled and a farm where restrictions on movement are to be cancelled after an inspection conducted in accordance with guidelines for urgent action for relief areas.