1. All claims filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the counterclaim claims filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

2...

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, Defendant, C, and D are E on September 1, 1983 (hereinafter “E”).

(2) On January 1986, 1986, the Plaintiff, the Defendant, and C agreed to jointly operate an automobile maintenance project, and the shares of D are equally divided, and around January 1, 1986, the remaining three partners agreed to pay D liquidation money following the withdrawal from the said project to D, and the Plaintiff, the Defendant, and the Plaintiff agreed to have one-third shares, respectively. (2) The three partners, including the Plaintiff, etc., purchased the F large 189 square meters in the name of the Defendant, which is one of the partners, and concluded a sales contract in the name of the Defendant, one-third of whom is the Plaintiff.

3) After C’s death in around 198, G, H, I, J, K, and L succeeded to the partnership business shares of C, and maintained the partnership business relationship with the Plaintiff and the Defendant. (b) On March 23, 2006, partners, including the Plaintiff on the termination of the partnership business agreement and the partnership business relationship, terminated the partnership business agreement, and on March 23, 2006, the 2261m2 of the Daegu Seogu Factory Site F in the real estate remaining at the time of the termination of the partnership business, the Defendant owned 1/28 shares, G, H, H, H, H, H, H, and I owned 3/28 shares, respectively, and the heir’s transfer registration of 1018m3m2 of the MU factory site was solely owned by the Plaintiff, and the heir’s ownership transfer registration was filed against the Defendant on the 198m20m27m2 of the title of G and 198m2.

2. As to the above case, on April 15, 2008 between the Plaintiff, the Defendant, and the Intervenor.