beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Around February 8, 2011, the defrauded made a false statement to the effect that “E” office located in Fransh-gu, Busan, which is operated by the Victim C, “The victim is higher than bank interest if he/she has subscribed to the insurance product, is higher than bank interest, more than other benefits, and (b) is entitled to directly purchase the insurance premium on the face of the policyholder.”
However, even if the defendant received money from the victim as insurance premiums, he was thought that he did not actually have an intention to subscribe to insurance products and used it for personal purposes such as repayment of debts.
The Defendant prepared an insurance subscription agreement with the victim and Samsung Life Insurance Co., Ltd. for the insurance contract, and received KRW 61,00,000 from the victim as insurance premiums, from that time, the Defendant received KRW 10,000,000 in total from May 3, 2013, such as the list of crimes in attached Form.
2. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;
A. On February 8, 2011, the Defendant: (a) prepared a computer for the purpose of deceiving the victim as if the Defendant had actually subscribed to the insurance product at KRW 10,00,000,000 of the insurance premium received from the victim under the preceding paragraph, which was the Defendant’s residence; (b) forged the receipt of the insurance premium in the name of the representative director of the Samsung Life Insurance Co., Ltd., in addition to the receipt of the other person’s insurance premium that was normally issued with the signature and seal of the representative director of the Samsung Life Insurance Co., Ltd., which was the Defendant’s dwelling; and (c) forged the receipt of the insurance premium in the name of the representative director of the Samsung Life Insurance Co., Ltd.
Defendant’s Month
9. In the office mentioned in paragraph 1, a forged insurance premium receipt was issued to the victim who was unaware of the forgery and exercised it as if it were a document duly formed.
Accordingly, the defendant is in the name of representative director of Samsung Life Insurance Co., Ltd. without authority.