The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Around 12:50 on July 29, 2013, the Defendant: (a) expressed his desire to see the victim D (mari, 22 years of age) in front of the C bus platform in the C bus platform in the Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si on July 29, 2013; (b) expressed the victim’s desire to “I am about. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am the victim’s head, and am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I

Until the police officers arrive, the Defendant continued to assault the victim by towing the victim into the bus platform, cutting the body of the victim by double hand, cutting the body of the victim over the bridge, cutting the head of the vehicle, and assaulting the victim on one occasion.

2. We examine the judgment. This is a crime falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records of this case, it is clear that the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant on May 9, 2014 after the institution of the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed under Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act and it is so decided as per Disposition.