A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall provide game products with the contents different from those of the game products rated by the Game Rating Board for the distribution or use thereof.

From April 7, 2014 to February 21, 2014, the Defendant changed the game of the son’s game as classified in the third floor “D Gameland” from the third floor of the building of Daegu Dong-gu to the third floor of the same month to the pure ability game in which the answer is continuous 2 times in the same location, the Defendant made it possible for the Defendant to automatically run the game without any manipulation according to the user’s judgment by installing 36 game of the “D Game”, which has different contents from the rating, by making it possible for the Defendant to appear in the same location as above at least three consecutive times.

As above, the Defendant provided customers with game products different from the contents classified by the Game Rating Board.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Review of the result of enforcement support;

1. Application of statutes on game description;

1. Subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the relevant Act on the Promotion of Game Industry concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime committed by the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 44(2) of the Act on the Promotion of Confiscation Industry Promotion is promoting the spirit of gambling of the people, and the corresponding punishment is needed, and the defendant has the record of having been sentenced to imprisonment for one year and six months with the same kind of power in 2009. However, the operating period of this case is a relatively short period, and the game machine has been seized, and the defendant is divided into and against the wrong facts, and the motive, background, means and method of the crime of this case, the situation before and after the crime, and other circumstances revealed in the arguments of this case.