The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In the absence of a misunderstanding of facts, the Defendant, on July 13, 2014, did not have inflicted an injury upon C by assaulting C, and the lower court found the Defendant guilty of this part.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, C, around 23:10 on July 13, 2014, confirmed where the defendant was the victim, and found the defendant. C, who was under the influence of alcohol and drink with other people, continued to fighting with the defendant. C, from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the lower trial, used the defendant's assault and practice, and consistently stated that C was an emergency room of the hospital; C's her son, who was contacted by the hospital, became the hospital of the victim; C's her son was suspected to have been assaulted by the defendant; C's her son was the victim of the victim's son; C did not appear to have been issued with C's 14th diagnosis on the ground that he did not commit an assault with the defendant; C's 2014th diagnosis on the ground that he did not have any reasons for the assault; C's 314th diagnosis.

B. The fact that the defendant was punished several times due to the same criminal conduct and the dual criminal conduct, the victims want to punish the defendant, and the age, character and conduct of the defendant, the motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc.