A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the indictment against insult is dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

On September 4, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for ten months with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Seoul Western District Court on September 4, 2012, and is still under the suspension of execution for which the judgment was finalized on September 12, 201

On May 12, 2013, at around 09:20 on May 12, 2013, the Defendant continued to drink prior to this period in the Defendant’s residence in Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu 302, and continued to use abusive and verbal abuse to her wife, and called “pine police” to the Seoul Mapo-gu Police Station E District Assistant F (the age of 46) called “pine police must be bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch son," and the Defendant expressed in his hand the sloping F at one time in his hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers for 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Previous records: Application of inquiry reports and investigation reports and investigation reports Acts and subordinate statutes, such as criminal records;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 136(1) of the Criminal Code of the pertinent statutory provisions on criminal facts [decision of types of punishment] The obstruction of performance of official duties [Scope of recommendations] from June to April (basic area] from June to April (decision of sentence] are as above.

Furthermore, even though the defendant committed the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties even during the period of suspension of execution, it is inevitable to sentence a sentence on the ground that there is no agreement between the victim and the victim.

However, in consideration of the fact that the defendant is against himself and is going to drink in the future, and other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, the punishment as the order shall be determined.

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. The Defendant, at around 12:05 on May 12, 2013, arrested flagrant offenders under suspicion of obstruction of the performance of official duties, at the Seoul Mapo Police Station and the office located in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, Seoul, and G, a person involved in other cases during the investigation atmosphere.