logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.02.12 2014나13950
매매대금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be the principal lawsuit.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the court added the following 2.3 judgments as to the matters alleged by the defendant in the court of first instance. Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The defendant's additional determination is not sufficient to acknowledge that the plaintiff's husband C expressed his intent of a share transfer contract by causing the error of his claim, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that the plaintiff's husband C expressed his intent of a share transfer contract by causing the error of the plaintiff's claim, and thus, the defendant's above assertion is not reasonable.

3. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is just based on this conclusion, and all appeals filed by the defendant against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim of this case are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow