logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.03.24 2016고정206
특수재물손괴
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 18, 2015, the Defendant destroyed KRW 80,000 of the repair cost by destroying air conditioners and glass door, which are dangerous objects on the table table, to the victim C and the victim C in Kimhae-si B, from September 18, 2015 to March 2015. Within the D main point of operation, the Defendant was assaulted by E, the victim’s son, and thereby damaging the Defendant’s disease, which is a dangerous object on the table table.

2. At around 03:30 on September 19, 2015, the Defendant destroyed the repair cost of KRW 150,000 on the ground that, in the front corridor of the instant main station, the said E does not go to a death, 2 stones with a stone of the size of drinking, which is a dangerous object prior to the preparation of the said E, led to a glass door adjacent to the entrance of the said main office, and the Defendant destroyed the glass window that is owned by the victim.

3. On September 28, 2015, the Defendant destroyed 100,000 won of the glass hold, which is the victim’s possession, where, around 01:0 on September 28, 2015, the Defendant had a stone string (15cm in width, 13cm in length, 9cm in thickness) with a stone string, which is a dangerous object near the victim’s house, on the ground that the said E does not go to death, and caused damage to KRW 10,000 for repair costs by destroying the two head of the glass hold, which is the victim’s possession.

4. At around 04:00 on September 28, 2015, the Defendant destroyed 150,000 won of repair costs by destroying the glass windows, which were the victim’s possession, where the victim’s glass windows had been exposed to the front of the instant main entrance, and the Defendant prepared in advance, on the ground that the said E does not go to the death of the building, and by failing to do so, the Defendant destroyed 150,000 won of repair costs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement protocol by the police for victims C (1, 2 times);

1. Each internal investigation report (including the verification of CCTV on September 18, 2015, a simple receipt for repair of the victim's glass, and each accompanying material with respect to the verification of CCTV on D main points);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Articles 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes.

arrow