The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of all the circumstances, including the fact that the defendant is against whom the summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment and imprisonment with labor for a period of one year and six months), the punishment sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant shows a reflective appearance while admitting all the crimes.

However, each of the crimes of this case was committed in collusion with C, C, and D from June 9, 2010 to October 12, 2012 by obtaining 12 victims' total amount of 7,580,000 won under the name of prepaid money as if they were to work as an employee. In collusion with co-offenders under a thorough plan, each of the crimes of this case was committed under the crime law and the frequency of the crimes. It was not good that the crime was committed; the damage amount was 75,80,000 won in total; the defendant did not make efforts to recover damage; the defendant was sentenced to 8 times a fine from 205 to 200, probation period, and 2 times a punishment for a repeated crime; the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor from October 14, 2009 to 200, and the defendant did not have any other similar motive for the crime of this case without any specific reason. In particular, the defendant's imprisonment with prison labor from 2005 to 3 months a prison.

3...