A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

40 million won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

In August 1987, the Defendant entered the Steel Product Manufacturing and Sales Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. in the port of port and thereafter worked as the director in charge of the above Company Investment Engineering Co., Ltd. from around 2016, and is in charge of reviewing the feasibility of the construction ordered in B, compiling investment budget, selecting qualified companies, supervising construction works, etc.

1. The Defendant, in breach of trust, was engaged in the business of selecting the construction company fairly in consideration of the credit rating of the company, the ability to receive orders, etc. when performing such duties as the feasibility review of the construction project related to the construction project ordered by B, the compilation of the investment budget, the selection of an eligible company, and the supervision of the construction project.

Nevertheless, on September 2016, the Defendant received a request from the Co., Ltd. to the effect that “The Co., Ltd., Ltd., entered into the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and entered the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., for more than ten years, to the effect that “The Co., Ltd., Ltd., will be awarded a subcontract for B construction.”

In the latter part of the second half of 2016, the Defendant continued to receive the unfair request from C to the effect that “The Project Bank D may select a subsing group in B and a second event group,” and confirmed that there is a need for the performance record of the construction works ordered in B to be selected in the subssing group in B and the second event group, and, after having confirmed that it is necessary for B to perform the construction works ordered by the Project Bank D to be selected in the subssing group in B and the second event group, the Defendant was willing to have the construction works ordered by the Project Bank D to accumulate the performance result by receiving a subcontract

On February 2, 2017, the Defendant ordered construction works such as “F”, “G”, etc. in the early Fman, the Defendant selected the LAB, the LAB, the LAB, and the LAB as the qualified company of the said corporation, and demanded the KAH to make a lump sum subcontract to the LAB in the event that the LAH is awarded a successful bid for the said construction works.

E around February 2017, around C shall notify C of the estimated budget price within the Dispute Resolution Bank and the estimated bid price of H, a competitor of the Dispute Resolution Bank and the Dispute Resolution Bank, and C shall be K.