1. In relation to the medical practice stated in the attached Form, the damages liability of the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) is 2.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a dentist who operates the Dental clinic located in the wife population C (hereinafter “Plaintiff hospital”).

B. On January 5, 2011 and March 9, 2011, the Defendant was undergoing a radiation photographing test at the Plaintiff hospital. As a result, the Defendant was found to have a chronic crypitis accompanied by a chronic crypitis loss of at least a level of ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic

C. On June 29, 2011, the Defendant received from the Plaintiff a fluoral right-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-on-hand-hand-on-hand-hand-hand-on-hand-hand-on-hand-hand-on-hand-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-out (hereinafter “the first fluor-on-out-out type-on symptoms-on-out” (hereinafter referred

E. However, if there were symptoms that were not caught with the bones, the Defendant, at the Plaintiff Hospital, had the Plaintiff’s hospital undergo a procedure to remove the marcule, as seen above, and received the marcing procedure from the Plaintiff on September 30, 2013 (hereinafter “instant marcing procedure”).

F. However, on December 11, 2013, 201, the Defendant, who had undergone a cromatic surgery as above, was found to have been administered with the upper right side of the Defendant’s cromatic surgery, and on January 7, 2014, by the Plaintiff, the Defendant was administered with the upper right side of the crode in Daegu on the upper right side of the cromatic surgery.

G. At present, the defendant is currently in a state of loss of Daegu (Ma16, Ma17) on the right-hand side, and shows symptoms of low capacity decline due to loss of baby.

[Reasons for Recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence 1 (including each branch number, if any, hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1, 2, 7, 8, and 9, and the net thousands of this Court.