1. The Defendant’s KRW 25,00,000 to the Plaintiffs, as well as 5% per annum from March 16, 2015 to September 22, 2015, respectively.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs are a veterinarian who has entered into a partnership agreement under the Civil Act to import and own racing horses, and the Defendant is a veterinarian who operates a H animal hospital within the marina society.

B. Around January 2014, the Plaintiffs purchased from Australia on September 9, 2012, 201, PYM (the horse of this case: I; I; hereinafter “the horse of this case”) and imported it into the Republic of Korea on October 2014.

C. On November 8, 2014, the end of the instant case: (a) the Defendant had been in charge of medical treatment on the part of the Plaintiff; and (b) on November 10, 2014, the Defendant left the instant horse injection to the end of the instant case.

At the time, the Defendant, including the horses in this case, laid the 11stma horses, and was infinite.

However, on November 11, 2014, the right side of the end of the instant case began to be frighten and to have a scarcity, and accordingly, on November 19, 2014, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the instant hospital after undergoing an inspection by having the Plaintiff go to the Seoul Mapo-Seoul Metropolitan City Seoul Metropolitan City Hospital veterinary Center, and was hospitalized in the said hospital after undergoing an inspection.

On the other hand, other two Mai (Ma-so, J, K) among the horses adjacent to the end of this case were suffering from credit.

E. On November 28, 2014, the Plaintiffs promised to completely recover from the Defendant’s treatment of the horses of this case to the extent that it can be performed by the end of December, 2014, and, in the event that it is not performed, the Defendant promised to perform the treatment on the horses of this case on January 28, 2014, the Defendant signed each letter stating that “The Defendant shall sign it on January 2015,” and the Defendant signed the said letter.

(Agreement concluded on the basis of each of the above agreements (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement of this case"). / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 3, Gap evidence 5-1, Gap evidence 9, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiffs' assertion did not fully insert the number of injections while the defendant puts injections to the end of this case and there was a side effect on the end of this case. The end of this case is the end of this case.