1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except as stated in paragraph (2) below. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this case by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the number of pages 8-12 shall be as follows.

On November 10, 2014, after the Defendant put the horses of this case into nearby culitis, sulllis, and sulploak sulphe sulphe sulphe sulphe sulphe sulphe sulphe sulphe sulphe sulphe sulphe sulphe sulphe sulphe sculphe sphe sculphe sculphe sculphe sculphe sculphe sculphe sculphe sculphe sculphe sculphe sculphe scule scir). On the same day, it was suspected that the Defendant had been compelled to perform the culphe sule scule sculphe sphe scire scules, etc.

In full view of the circumstances such as the fact that the Defendant’s obligation cannot be deemed to be exempted, it cannot be deemed that there was no negligence on the part of the Defendant regarding failure to perform the obligation to treat the horses of this case by the end of December 2014.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted.

3. According to the conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and all appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.