beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
46,265,90 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On February 13, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on July 5, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 5, 2014. ② On August 13, 2015, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced six months of imprisonment with prison labor and one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court on August 13, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive and conclusive on December 5, 2015, and ① the suspended sentence
【Criminal Facts】
1. No person, other than an attorney-at-law, shall receive or promise to receive money, valuables, entertainment or other benefits, provide legal counseling services, prepare legal documents and other legal services;
A. From the end of August 2014, the Defendant stated that “Around the end of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant is not an attorney-at-law, and there is no legitimate intention or ability to deal with legal affairs because he is not an attorney-at-law office,” and that “A who works as an adviser in the victim B In the victim B in the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. is a director of an attorney-at-law office, and would be able to receive the outstanding amount from the debtor D through litigation, preservative measures, compulsory execution procedures, etc., if he is the principal fees and expenses, he would be able to receive the outstanding amount from the debtor D through litigation, preservative measures, and compulsory execution procedures.” Accordingly, the Defendant received the order to provide collateral from the victim on September 3, 2014, the court issued the order to provide collateral, and received the total amount of KRW 1,986,00,000 on September 1, 20, 2014, and received the legal affairs such as money and valuables from the enforcement officer.
B. On September 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the place described in paragraph (a) around the end of 1, 2014, the said C is well treated.
The amount of outstanding claims not received from the debtor E shall also be the provisional attachment procedure and the proceedings on the merits, such as the fee and the cost.