Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by a fine of 1,00,000 won.

Defendant

B and C shall be subject to the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

around 20:30 on May 15, 201, the Defendants called the Seo-gu Office of Embrypt, Daejeon Western Police Station F District patrol Team G, and slope H called the Defendants’ gambling boom at the site after receiving a report of gambling, and obstructed the Defendants’ gambling booming, and recorded the site pictures, Defendant A made it difficult for him to breathize the board and collect the cards used for gambling outside of the window, and continued to gather them out of the window, and “I will not interfere with the execution of the official duties of the police officer, and I would like to interfere with the execution of the official duties of the Defendant 2 with the body of the above Party B, with the very heavy width of the Defendant’s body.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness G and H;

1. Application of the F District Work Hours Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act (see Supreme Court Decision 2009Do3505, Jun. 25, 2009)

1. Selection of punishment;

(a) A: Imprisonment;

B. B and C: Selection of fine

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (Defendant B and C) at the workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A);

1. Probation or order to attend a lecture (Defendant A) under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the defendant B and C) does not seem to have caused difficulty in gambling investigation, etc. by obstructing the performance of official duties against police officers.