1. The defendant is based on the sale on August 9, 1978 with respect to the real estate stated in the attached list to the plaintiff.

In fact, on August 9, 1978, the deceased B entered into a sales contract (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) with respect to the land share of the instant store (hereinafter “instant share”) with the Defendant and Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government No. 1, 115 Dabbes, 8 Gabs, 115 Gabs, 4 Dabs, 115 Gabs, 8 Gabs, and the land share of the instant store (hereinafter “instant share”), and completed the registration of ownership transfer for the instant store on August 14, 1978.

On January 30, 1996, the network B donated the instant store and the instant shares to the Plaintiff (76.61/7/383.07/3 of shares), E (153.23/3 of shares), and F (153.07/3 of shares), and E and F donated the entire shares of the instant store and the instant shares to the Plaintiff on November 6, 2002.

On June 14, 2006, the register on the land of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 2,572 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”). On September 18, 2006, the owners of the said D stores, including the Plaintiff, filed a lawsuit against the Defendant, etc., who is the co-owner of the instant land, seeking the implementation of the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer with respect to each of the instant land out of the instant land by the Seoul Central District Court 2006Gahap80242, Sept. 18, 2006.

In the above litigation procedure on April 18, 2008, a judicial compromise between the plaintiff, etc. and the defendant was established as follows (hereinafter “conciliation in this case”).

1. The Defendant recognized that the Plaintiff’s share in the land that the Plaintiff sought by the instant lawsuit was sold at the time of selling the previous building at the time of selling the previous building, and that the Plaintiff’s side was lawfully acquired through the successive transfer, and therefore, cooperate in the procedures necessary for the registration

2. However, all expenses related to the transfer of procedures, etc. shall be borne by the plaintiff side, guaranteed that there is no defect in the acquisition of rights by the plaintiff side in relation to the transfer of rights, and the plaintiff shall be held responsible for the problems arising from defects.

3. The above agreement is in the past by the Defendant Kangnam Institute.