Defendants shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is the head of the management office of the apartment in Kimpo-si.

At around 08:30 on September 9, 2013, the Defendant, at the front corridor No. 701, 1302, suffered an injury to the victim B (n, 41 years of age) residing in the above E Apartment No. 1302 and the issue of default on management expenses, in order for the victim to avoid dialogue and re-enter into the house, and to prevent the defect, the Defendant, by hand, carried out an injury, such as the victim’s hand and the knife of the shoulder, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

2. Defendant B is a person who resides in E apartment Nos. 701 Dong 1302 as stated in the above paragraph (1).

The Defendant, at the date, time, and place mentioned in the above paragraph (1), was able to take measures to prevent the victim A (n, 50 years of age) from entering his house, and suffered bodily injury, such as climatic salt, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment, by cutting off the victim's head debt.

Summary of Evidence

Facts No. 1

1. Each legal statement of witness B and F;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Statement No. B in the police interrogation protocol (alternative) of the police officer as to A and B;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Facts set forth in paragraph 2 of the Decision on the Medical Certificate of Injury (Evidence No. 2);

1. Each legal statement of witness A and F;

1. A suspect interrogation protocol of the police officer;

1. Statement A among the suspect interrogation protocol (alternative) of the police about A and B;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions concerning criminal facts and the Defendants’ choice of punishment: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant A’s defense counsel on the assertion of Defendant A’s defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; Defendant A’s above act constitutes a justifiable act that does not violate social rules; thus, Defendant A’s above act constitutes a justifiable act. Therefore, the requirements for the reasonableness of means and methods and supplement, etc. are met.