Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On November 1:50 of 2012, the Defendant: (a) applied for the provisional injunction against the transfer of the building rent of 6.8 million won in arrears from the 4th floor of G Building managed by the Victim F (35 years of age) in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the fourth floor; (b) applied for the provisional injunction against the transfer of the building rent of 6.8 million won to the court; (c) attached the attachment marking Stick on the original goods, etc., along with the court execution officer; and (d) caused the Defendant’s injury requiring medical treatment for approximately 14 days by placing the victim’s back head on two occasions in his/her hand; and (d) making the victim’s back head on two occasions in his/her hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness F, I, and J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the victim who has consistently testified that he/she had inflicted an injury on himself/herself as stated in its reasoning, and the circumstances leading up to the statement are natural and specific, and the credibility of the statement is high.

In addition, the witness I, J and the defendant statement to the effect that the defendant committed the crime as stated in the victim's judgment, raising the credibility of the victim's statement, and the defendant himself/herself also has a dispute over the degree of smuggling of the victim's loss.

In light of these circumstances, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant committed an injury as stated in its reasoning.

Summary of Evidence

Considering the fact that the defendant denies and denies the crime, the criminal record of the defendant, the fact that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, the degree of the injury in this case, the circumstances of the crime, etc.