logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016. 05. 11. 선고 2015누59176 판결
전심절차 이후 제소기간이 도과하여 제기된 소이므로 부적합함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court-2014-Gu Group-15231 ( May 8, 2015)

Title

It is inappropriate because the period of filing a lawsuit has elapsed after the previous trial procedure.

Summary

(1) The administrative litigation against the disposition imposing national taxes shall be filed within 90 days after the decision on the request for examination or adjudgment is notified. The lawsuit in this case shall be deemed to be filed after the lapse of the time limit for filing the lawsuit.

Related statutes

Article 17 of the Income Tax Act

Cases

2015Nu59176 Unreasonable Revocation of Disposition of Imposing Transfer Income Tax;

Plaintiff and appellant

○ ○

Defendant, Appellant

○○ Head of Tax Office et al.

Judgment of the first instance court

Seoul Administrative Court 2014Gudan15231 ( May 8, 2015)

Conclusion of Pleadings

April 20, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

May 11, 2016

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The imposition of penalty tax of KRW 41,369,373 shall be revoked in the capital gains tax for the year 2004, which the Defendants imposed on the Plaintiff on July 1, 2010.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of this court's judgment is the same as that of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Conclusion

The judgment of the first instance is justifiable. All of the plaintiffs' appeals are dismissed.

arrow