Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 23, 2017, the Defendant’s defamation: (a) around 14:38, the Seocho-gu Seoul High Court at the Seocho-gu Seoul High Court, Seocho-gu, Seoul High Court, 157 Seoul High Court; (b) whether the Defendant was able to receive the money from the husband B in front of the third elevator.

“I have heard, C, etc. the victim’s “I have been able to see theme in the subject of this fraud, and the victim’s “I have been able to see theme of this fraud, as I have been able to see theme of this fraud;

b) whether he/she has money in his/her place and does not send his/her house to his/her father and her mother;

This change of fraud has been well-known and well-known by lending money to the victim, and the her husband was 28 criminal records and the her husband was 28 criminal records, and the victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.

2. On February 23, 2017, the injured Defendant: (a) while engaging in a dispute with the victim for the same reason as described in paragraph (1) in front of the elevator of the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul High Court 157 Seoul High Court, the Defendant: (b) pushed the victim’s body by hand on the ground that the victim obstructed his front; (c) continuously fell from the elevator on the first floor, pushed the victim’s body on the number of floors; (d) walking the victim’s right side from the stairs outside the first floor, walking the part of the victim’s right side, such as the victim’s body on the hand; and (e) took the victim’s body on three occasions with the Handphone, and inflicted an injury, such as chest 21 days in need of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant (the second public trial date);

1. Each legal statement of witness C and B;

1. Application of a copy of the death diagnosis report, a photo of damaged parts, on-site photographs, extraction photographs of CCTV images at the site of the case, a certificate of medical records, and the statutes governing video CDs at the site of the case;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act (a point of defamation in a false fact), Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (a point of harm), and the choice of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The order of provisional payment;