The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In full view of the relevant evidence, such as the summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts), K, N, and M’s statements, files of exclusive contracts discovered at H computers, and news report materials distributed at H, the fact that the Defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory even though the exclusive contract was concluded between H and H, and thereby, D demanded withdrawal of news report materials from H and sent them by facsimile, and the Defendant sent the exclusive contract with E by facsimile.

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged.

2. Determination

A. On August 30, 2012, the Defendant appeared at the court of Seocho-gu Seoul High Court No. 157, Seoul High Court No. 306, the aforementioned court of 2012Na 4369, and Defendant E, as a witness, to take an oath, and to make testimony.