logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.06.19 2015고단2182
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Except as otherwise expressly provided for in any other Act, no means of access, such as an electronic card or other similar electronic information, used to issue a transaction request in electronic financial transactions in violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act or to secure the authenticity and accuracy of users and the details of such transaction shall be transferred or acquired;

A. On January 2012, at the end of Gyeonggi-do, the Defendant taken photographs of the passbook (Account Number:F), its password, security cards used for Internet banking, and the issuance password of an authorized certificate, etc. in the E dormitory where D, the husband of the Defendant, working for the Defendant, who is the husband of the Defendant in the wife population C, at the end of Gyeonggi-do, using the mobile phone camera function in the mobile phone, and then sent the video to G in China with the Internet Mesenger’s authorized certificate.

Accordingly, the Defendant transferred the means of access to G.

B. On December 31, 2014, at around 12:56, the Defendant: (a) taken the Defendant’s home located in the wife population H of Gyeonggi-do using the mobile camera function of the mobile camera at the Defendant’s home located in the Dong-si, Gyeonggi-do, using the aforementioned passbook, its password, security cards used for Internet banking, and the issuance password of an authorized certificate; and (b) transmitted the video to the said G to the said G to the mobile Kakaox, thereby obtaining an authorized certificate of the said account.

Accordingly, the Defendant transferred the means of access to G.

2. The defrauded acquired mobile merchandise coupons by hacking, etc., and conspired to use the mobile merchandise coupons from the victimized company as merchandise coupons.

The Defendant, around January 2, 2015, is a gift certificate that has been issued normally and possessed by the damaged company’s mobile gift certificates by hacking, etc. at the unit original store of the Home Packer Co., Ltd. 】 (hereinafter “The Home Packer Co., Ltd.”), and the Defendant is an original store of the Home Packer Co., Ltd..

arrow