logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.02.07 2016나31693
계약불이행에 따른 손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

3. The first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case in this case are as follows: "Defendant A" in Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance is as "Defendant A"; "Defendant A" in Part 4 as "Defendant A"; "4,314,411 won" in Part 8 as "1,697,411 won"; "4,000 won" in Part 8 as "1,398,000 won"; "1,576,989 won" in Part 21 as "4,93,989 won"; "1,398,000 won" in Part 8 as "4,015,000 won", and "4,000 won" in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act is as stated in the judgment of the first instance.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and all appeals against the Defendants by the Plaintiff are dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is determined to be corrected as it is obvious that “1,697,411 won” and “1,576,989 won” in paragraph (1) of the judgment of the court of first instance is a clerical error of “4,193,989 won.” It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow