The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (4 months of imprisonment).

2. In full view of the facts that the Defendant committed the instant crime in a state of mental disability and that some of the damaged goods of the instant crime were returned to or expected to be returned to the victims, or that the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes during the suspension period of execution for the same kind of crime, and that there is no change in the specific circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment, and other various circumstances that form the conditions for the pleadings and the sentencing indicated in the records, such as the amount of damage, Defendant’s age, character and character, character, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court against the Defendant is deemed appropriate.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, it is clear that "victim C" and "victim C" of the judgment of the court below under Article 25 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Rule are the clerical errors of "victim AG". Thus, "victim C" of the judgment of the court below is the clerical errors of "victim AG", respectively, and the same is corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Rule.