The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the circumstances such as the Defendant’s character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., as well as all the circumstances that form the conditions for the pleadings and the sentencing indicated in the record, such as the circumstance after the sentence of the lower judgment, it is recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is adequate, in full view of the following: (a) the Defendant was committed under favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime; (b) the Defendant agreed to the Defendant’s agreement with the victim of the crime of interference with business; (c) the Defendant had been punished several times as the same crime; and (d) the Defendant committed the

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.