1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, since Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance except for the submission or addition of part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows.

(hereinafter the meaning of the terms used in this case is the same as the judgment of the court of first instance). 2. 2. the fourth part of the part being dried or added is "," and the fact that other bidders except the plaintiff and the corporation E participate in the instant tender is without dispute between the parties."

Article 92(1)7 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Local Contracts Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 25140, Feb. 5, 2014; hereinafter the same shall apply) provides for one of the causes for the restriction on participation in tendering under Article 92(1)7 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Local Contracts Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 25140, Feb. 5, 2014; hereinafter the same shall apply), “(i)” and “(ii)” shall not necessarily be agreed upon by all the participants in tendering in order to fall under one of the causes for the restriction on participation in tendering under Article 92(1)7 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Local Contracts Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 25140, Aug. 6, 2013.

"Flags. 5 13 and 14 shall be deleted. The 6th page "100 million won" shall be added to "300 million won", and the 8th page "no" or "no" shall be added to the following: