logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.07.19 2015가단18582
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The Plaintiff, upon the Defendant’s request from October 2012 to August 2013, 2013, completed the installation work of 8 plastic houses in the Kimhae-si, a vinyl house 16, a farm 1, and a D. In that process, the construction cost of KRW 168,754,125 was put in, but only received KRW 145,550,00 from the Defendant, and claimed that the Defendant did not receive the remainder of KRW 23,204,125.

The plaintiff received KRW 145,50,00 from the defendant as the cost of installing plastic greenhouse and scambling, but there is no dispute between the parties. However, it is not sufficient to recognize that the entries or images of Gap evidence 1 through 5 have the cost equivalent to KRW 168,754,125 in the construction process, and there is no other evidence to recognize otherwise. Thus, the plaintiff's above assertion on the premise that the construction cost equivalent to KRW 168,754,125 has been paid, is without merit.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow