beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 61,298,367 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from January 27, 2017 to July 18, 2018.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff owned a vinyl house, insect breeding facility, etc. (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s vinyl house, etc.”) in Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, and the Defendant owned a vinyl house, warehouse, etc. (hereinafter “the Defendant’s vinyl house, etc.”) in the vicinity of the Plaintiff’s vinyl house, etc., but there was a narrow width between the Plaintiff’s vinyl house, etc. and the Defendant’s vinyl house, etc.
B. On January 27, 2017, around January 27, 2017, the Plaintiff’s vinyl facilities, etc. of this case and the Defendant’s vinyl facilities, etc. of this case, and most of the Plaintiff’s vinyl facilities, etc. of this case, and the Defendant’
(hereinafter “instant fire”).
C. The main contents of the instant fire site report prepared by the public fire station and fire station (hereinafter “instant report”) are as follows.
In summary, the fire of this case was found to have been around the time when the reporter reported to be a fire that occurred in the plaintiff's greenhouse located in D glass, and in the defendant's vinyl. However, the defendant's vinyl was presumed to have been burned to the plaintiff's vinyl, which is a strong wind spacker, from the side of the Defendant's vinyl, and was reported to the plaintiff's greenhouse. The fire of this case appears to have been burned out from the 119 fire report. The fire of this case appears to have been launched from the inside of the defendant's vinyl. The fire of this case was occupied by workers at the time of use as the lodging place of the defendant's vinyl work (foreigner). The fire of this case was presumed to have been a fire that was caused by the non-explosive causes, but it was presumed to have been a fire by the non-explosive formula because the degree of fire at the scene of the fire is serious and accurate.
8. In the vicinity of the area where the possibility of fire-prevention was likely to be examined and the possibility of fire-prevention could not be identified, and the possibility of fire-prevention is considered to be low. The electrical factors of this case.