logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.02.02 2016고단6391
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On May 27, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for fraud, etc., one year of imprisonment, and one year and two months of imprisonment at the Seoul Southern District Court on April 25, 2012 and completed the execution of the sentence. On February 17, 2016, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced two years of imprisonment for fraud and became final and conclusive on the 25th of the same month.

[Criminal facts]

1. 2016 high group 6391

A. On April 8, 2015, the criminal defendant against the victim C visited the victim C’s “E” store located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul, to visit the victim C’s “E” store, and charged the victim C with artificial apartment 602 in Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul, Seoul. The defendant paid the cost of Doing and laging construction, as it becomes the termination of construction.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the Defendant did not have much experience in interior works, and there was only a plan to acquire profits by starting construction work and ending construction work in the middle after he started the construction work with a certain amount exceeding the scope of the Defendant’s ability to cope with by advertising the Internet, etc. without a certain store at the time. Thus, there was no intention or ability to pay the cost even if the victim is entrusted with the construction work.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and caused the victim to do so, but he did not pay the above apartment expenses of KRW 2,750,000 to 2,750,000 and did not pay the above apartment expenses, thereby acquiring property profits equivalent to the above amount.

In addition, the Defendant’s indictment of KRW 11,527,00 from around the above time to May 21, 2015, including this, stated the victim’s indictment of KRW 12,967,00 in total at KRW 11,527,00 for five times from around the above time. However, in light of the fact that the sum of the amounts listed in attached Table 1 of the daily list of crimes constitutes KRW 11,527,00, the above provision is deemed to be a clerical error, and thus, the above provision is deemed to be a clerical error.

arrow