All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the grounds of appeal by Defendant A and B in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower judgment, the lower court is justifiable to have determined that all of the charges of this case against Defendant A and B were guilty on the grounds as indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on criminal intent and duty relationship in the crime of acceptance of bribe and the admissibility of the prosecutor’s interrogation protocol against Co-defendant C, or by violating due process.

2. Examining the grounds of appeal by Defendant C in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the judgment below, the court below was just in finding Defendant C guilty of all the charges of this case on the grounds stated in its holding. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the criminal intent in the crime of offering of bribe, etc., by misapprehending the logical and empirical rules and exceeding the bounds of

3. All appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.