All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on Defendant A’s grounds of appeal (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed), in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court is justifiable to have determined that all facts charged against Defendant A were found guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, or exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, thereby misapprehending the legal doctrine on the criteria for determining the credibility of statements, or did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “Intimidation”

2. Examining the grounds of appeal by Defendant B and C in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the judgment below, the court below was just in finding Defendant B and C guilty of all the charges of this case on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, thereby exceeding the bounds of the principle of logic and experience and by misapprehending the principle

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.