The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although the Defendant’s judgment on the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is against the instant crime, considering the following factors: (a) the Defendant has committed the instant crime several times before and during the period of repeated crime; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime with the victims and did not reach an agreement with the victims, the sentence of sentence is inevitable. Considering the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, occupation, home environment, background of the instant crime, means and method, circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s imprisonment (six months) is not appropriate and unreasonable.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, pursuant to Article 25 of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, the applicable column of the judgment of the court below

1. Items of ordinary competition and matters of competition;

1. Change ex officio by adding "1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor for each choice of punishment" among repeated crime items:

.