The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. It is reasonable to consider that the Defendant’s judgment on the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is against the instant crime, and that the Defendant sells a vehicle used for the instant crime under the Defendant’s promise not to drive without obtaining a license. However, considering that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of suspension of execution several times, the sentence of sentence is inevitable, and considering the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, occupation, home environment, the background, means and method of the instant crime, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, the lower court’s imprisonment (4 months of imprisonment) is not appropriate and unreasonable.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.