logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.07.13 2017고단1239
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On May 18, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective deadly weapon, etc.) at the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court on May 18, 2012 and completed the execution of the sentence on October 18, 2014.

[Criminal facts]

1. On May 17, 2017, at around 02:46, the Defendant informed the victim E (V), who is an employee of the said public telephone, of the 114-lane of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daegu, of the phone number of 16:14 from his cell phone to his own cell phone number, and threatened the victim E (V, 52 years old), who is an employee of the said public telephone, via the said public telephone, of the 02:5 on the same day.

2. The Defendant interfered with the operation of trains and interfered with the performance of deceptive duties at the time and place described in paragraph 1 as above by making a false report to the staff E of the D Station “05 to spread off the D Station,” thereby allowing the staff of the D Station to search explosives inside and outside the D Station, and allowing them to pass through the D Station after going through the railroad station on the three freight trains, which were scheduled to pass through the D Station, to stop the normal operation of trains by means of a deceptive scheme for a total of 3 hours to 25 minutes and 06:20 minutes from the same day, and at the same time, interfered with the operation and history management of the staff of the D Station staff of the Korean Korean Railroad Corporation, and at the same time, around 03:05 of the same day, by forcing the police officer to go to the police officer during a total of 3 hours and 5 hours during the same period from 06:0 to 35 hours during the police officer’s lawful execution of explosives by means of a deceptive scheme.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Seizure records;

1. 6 copies of each internal investigation report (Evidence List 2, 112, 15), investigation report (Evidence List 16, 18), 114 recording files, 112 recording files, six copies of each report processing case;

1. A previous conviction in judgment:

arrow