The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that the summary of the grounds for appeal is unfair because the punishment (4 months of imprisonment and 40 hours of completion of sexual assault treatment programs) declared by the court below is too large.

2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects the mistake, and that he was diagnosed with acute multi-level mental disorder around 2008.

However, the crime of this case is deemed to have committed an indecent act by inserting hands in the victim's panty panty, which the defendant was spanty at a sobrying place, and the victim seems to have suffered a big mental shock, and the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case. Even though there was a record of criminal punishment as to the part of 11 years of age in the sobry 2009 around March, 209, the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case is committed the crime of this case, considering the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, there is no special circumstance or change that is newly considered in sentencing after the decision of the court below, and in full view of various circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and method of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the punishment imposed by the court below is unreasonable because it is too excessive

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.