The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that the summary of the grounds for appeal is unfair because the punishment (7 million won of a fine and 40 hours of completion of a sexual assault treatment program) declared by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected, and that an agreement has been reached with the victim.

However, the crime of this case is a case where the defendant committed an indecent act by force by deceiving the victim's chest and sound, and the victim seems to have been subject to considerable mental impulse due to the crime of this case, and the degree of indecent act is not somewhat weak; the defendant has been punished for various crimes such as violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, gambling, intimidation, bodily injury, larceny, property damage, crime of interference with business, etc.; and in particular, on November 19, 2014, after having been sentenced to two years of suspension of execution for the crime of interference with business on November 27, 2014, which became final and conclusive as of November 27, 2014, the crime of this case was committed, and the above judgment became final and conclusive and conclusive, taking into account the circumstances such as equity with criminal punishment against other crimes similar to the crime of this case, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, method and method of the crime, etc., and circumstances after the crime of this case, it cannot be deemed unfair.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.