logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.06.02 2014가합13311
하자보수보증금 등
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to KRW 80,170,350, and KRW 55,368,290, among Defendant DESC Co., Ltd. and KRW 55,368,290.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1 of the parties concerned) The plaintiff is an apartment building A in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu (hereinafter referred to as "the apartment building of this case").

(2) In order to manage the 11-dong 11-dong 11-dong 11-dong 11-dong 11-dong 1-dong 1, the autonomous management organization is a business entity that constructed and sold the instant apartment complex, and the Defendant’s assistant owner is a construction company that received and supplied the instant apartment building from Defendant DSC 1 to execute the construction of the instant apartment. The Defendant’s assistant owner is a guarantee company that entered into a warranty contract for the instant apartment as follows, regardless of whether the name was changed from the Korea Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation (Act No. 12989, Jan. 6, 2015) to the Korea Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation pursuant to Article 4 of the Addenda to the Housing and Urban Fund Act (Act No. 12989, Jan. 6, 2015).

B. From August 24, 2010 to August 23, 2011, the guarantee period of the contract for the repair of defects and the usage inspection No. 110 to August 24, 2011 to August 23, 2011; 2,952,769, 113 to August 23, 2012 to August 24, 201 to August 23, 201; 362,362, 215, 2904 to be paid by the Intervenor during the guarantee period of the repair of defects and the guaranteed warranty bond of this case to the Intervenor within the scope of the guarantee period No. 1067, Aug. 24, 201 to be paid by the 2010 to Defendant 16, 27, 2017; 4671, 4675 to August 26, 2017; 207.

(1) The Defendant’s assistant intervenor entered into a warranty contract and received a warranty. (2) On August 23, 2010, the Defendant’s assistant intervenor entered into a warranty contract and received a pre-use inspection on the instant apartment from the high-sea market, and thereafter, constituted the Plaintiff, an autonomous management body of the instant apartment.

arrow