1. The Defendant and the Intervenor’s Intervenor’s appeal are dismissed.

2. The supplementary participation from among the total costs of the lawsuit after the filing of the appeal.

The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows: "The contents of the written statement are primarily related to irregularities that occurred in the course of employing full-time faculty members of the university, and it is consistent with objective facts with the purpose of the court's deliberation of the above provisional disposition application case. The plaintiff does not appear to have submitted a written statement to the court due to his personal complaints, etc. on the ground that the plaintiff slanders or damages reputation or credit of the university or other faculty members, etc. on the ground that he knew of his knowledge in the course of employing full-time faculty members, and rather, it appears that the court had an intention to examine whether the grounds for exclusion of D from the secondary examination or the course of employing full-time faculty members were illegal based on objective facts, and "the result" of the first 16th act of "the plaintiff is likely to prepare a written statement according to D's request," and it is not likely that the plaintiff's act or act of cooperation with the court of first instance, other than the specific grounds and side effects of Article 20 of the Civil Procedure Act, cannot be seen as it is."

(The grounds alleged by the Defendant and the Intervenor in the trial while appealed are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the first instance court, and even if all the evidence submitted by the first instance court are examined, it cannot be viewed as different from the fact-finding and judgment by the first instance court).