A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 18:40 on May 5, 2019, the Defendant arrested a flagrant offender to police officers belonging to the Seocho Police Station C district unit in Seoul, Seocho-gu, who called up after receiving a report on the assault case between the Defendant and B at the high speed terminal station of the subway No. 9 located in Seocho-gu, the Defendant: (a) drafted a written self-written statement at around 19:20 on May 5, 201; (b) entered the name and resident number (F) written statement at the Seocho Police Station C unit in Seocho-gu, Seoul; and (c) issued the written self-written statement to G, who was aware of his signature, without knowledge of the fact.

Accordingly, the defendant forged another person's signature for the purpose of exercising the right, and exercised the forged other person's signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports on written statements of suspect interrogation records to E (request for telephone conversations and communications data with the suspect E and reply related thereto);

1. Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 239(2) and Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act, the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act by adding fines to concurrent crimes involving the imposition of fines for a crime;

1. The crime of this case with the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act of Article 62-1 of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of the Criminal Act is that the defendant entered his name in his written statement in the police investigation process and signed it and used it, and the nature of the crime is not good.

However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and against his mistake, the case subject to investigation does not constitute a criminal case by expressing his/her intention of not to punish each other due to minor assault, and the defendant issued a continuous demand order to the creditors of the defendant's mother from the time of his/her year to disclose his/her contact address and residence to another person.