beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
To the extent that it does not harm the identity of the facts charged, the defendant's right to defense, part of the facts charged shall be corrected and stated in accordance with the
On April 24, 2013, the Defendant rendered a comprehensive civil petition office for branch court of the Incheon District Court (Seoul District Court) with the Defendant’s payment of KRW 6 million to the victim C on June 11, 2012 and June 29, 2012. The Defendant paid the purchase price pursuant to the sales contract for the land Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si (hereinafter “instant land”) on May 17, 2012. There was no conclusive agreement on the return of the purchase price, and there was no money lending to the victim. However, even though there was no money lending to the Defendant, the obligee A lent to the obligor C the total amount of KRW 12 million ( KRW 6 million, KRW 6 million, KRW 600,000, KRW 600,000, KRW 6000, June 11, 2012). However, the obligor C had to pay the principal and the annual repayment rate of KRW 200,000,0000.
After submitting a complaint stating false facts to the effect that “,” the above court conducted a lawsuit by obtaining a public notice order from the above court, and by submitting as evidence the details of the payment of the purchase-price of the instant land in this case, deceiving the said court division in charge, and then, he/she was sentenced to the judgment of the court in charge that “the payment of money calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from December 20, 2013 and from December 21, 2013 to the date of full payment,” and that “the payment of money calculated at the rate of 12 million won per annum and 20% per annum from December 21, 2013 to the date of full payment,” the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 19, 2014.
[In the prosecutorial investigation, the Defendant provided that the victim would have been able to repay the purchase-price of the instant land to the victim later, and that the victim would have been able to repay the money later, and thus, the Defendant’s claim for the loan to the victim.