beta
Text
Defendants are innocent.
Reasons
The summary of the facts charged is that around December 23, 201, Defendant B entered into a joint agreement with the victim F and one parcel of land outside Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to jointly invest in the sale of new house and distribute the profit therefrom, and delivered 350 million won on the same day from the victim, and 150 million won on the following day, but did not pay the amount promised to the victim.
In addition, Defendant B made the registration of ownership transfer under Defendant A on the ground of a sales contract on November 1, 2011, with respect to the seven members of Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu, which was the ownership of his female on June 27, 2012, when Defendant B did not pay the victim the above amount.
Around March 20, 2013, the victim filed a lawsuit against the Defendants at the Seoul Central District Court to the effect that “Defendant B shall pay the victim the above 500 million won and interest thereon, and shall cancel the registration of transfer of ownership made under the name of Defendant A for the above seven generations on the grounds of a sales contract among the Defendants.”
The Defendants, as if the above sales contract was concluded before the victim delivered KRW 500 million to Defendant B, conspired the relevant evidence to induce the trial division in charge of the above court and to accept a favorable judgment from the trial division in charge of this case.
The Defendants presented to the Seoul Central District Court on September 26, 2013 the “sale contract” and the “receipt receipt” prepared as of November 1, 201 to the competent division of the Seoul Central District Court as of November 1, 201 in accordance with the above public offering relationship, along with the preparatory documents, to the effect that “a contract with Dara7 generation was concluded on November 1, 201, prior to the establishment of the victim’s loan claim, and thus does not constitute a fraudulent act.” However, the above contract was concluded after the victim’s claim was established.
Ultimately, the Defendants conspired to take charge of the above court.