The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a store working at a mutual general restaurant called “C wooden store” located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s statement and evidence, the Defendant revised the criminal facts as above, given that the Defendant was not a person operating the “C bath store” but rather a person working in the above store.

No person shall sell, lend, distribute, or provide free of charge drugs, etc. harmful to juveniles to juveniles.

Nevertheless, at around 01:20 on June 23, 2019, the Defendant did not verify the identification card of the juvenile, such as the above restaurant, D (n, 18 years of age) and sold the soft, beer, etc., which are drugs harmful to juveniles, without checking the identification card properly.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. D's written confirmation;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 59 subparagraph 6 of the Act on the Punishment of Crimes and Article 28 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles Eligible for the Selection of Punishment;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (one hundred thousand won per day converted);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence [1] of the Suspension of Sentence 59(1) [2] The juvenile on the day of the instant case is accompanied by three adult male visitors, and the adult male was frequently on the main points of the instant case, and there seems to have been some circumstances that make it difficult to suspect D as a juvenile in view of the appearance of D or clothes clothes, etc. (at the time of the first dispatch, the control police officer also seems to have controlled the instant crime by sending D after receiving the second report after receiving the second report after undergoing an identification card without undergoing an identification card against D (at the time of the first dispatch).

(3) The Defendant appears to have relatively thoroughly conducted an identification card inspection at the main point of this case, and ④ Taking into account the fact that the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment, except for the Defendant who has been sentenced to a fine twice for a crime of double-class crime, and has no record of being punished for the same crime, etc.)