logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.12.27 2017고단4710
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 18, 2017, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) was on board a taxi operated by B in the vicinity of the fire-fighting box of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, in the vicinity of the fire-fighting patrol box; and (b) arrived at around 01:45 on the same day on the same day, and did not pay KRW 5,520 of the taxi fee without justifiable grounds.

The Defendant, as such, was on board a business vehicle and without justifiable reasons, did not set up a value.

2. On September 18, 2017, around 02:20, the Defendant: (a) took a bath at the front of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu); (b) took a police box affiliated with police officers of the Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station E box called up after receiving a report of 112 on the same ground as the preceding paragraph; and (c) took a bath to the police officers of the Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station E box ( South, 41 years old); and (d) took the f’s breast and the f’s chest back and the f’s hand, h

As such, the Defendant assaulted a police officer to interfere with the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation of a crime and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties, selecting fines) concerning the crime, and Article 3 (1) 39 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of freeboard) concerning the punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not mean that the criminal liability of the accused for the reason for sentencing of the order of provisional payment is less severe, but the circumstances immediately after the crime are also bad, but in depth reflects the crime, the fact that there is no record of the crime, and the living environment, etc., a fine shall be selected and the punishment shall be determined as the same as the order.

arrow