1. The Defendants shall do so within the scope of the property inherited from the network G to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party; hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”) and the designated parties are companies or personal entrepreneurs engaged in grain products, packaging paper printing, and food additives selling business, and the network G was engaged in manufacturing and retailing non- alcohol beverages, such as tea and coffee, with the trade name of K food, from the J at the Pacific City.

B. To the network G, the Plaintiff: (a) flive flives, etc.; (b) Appointers Co., Ltd.; (c) Appointers Co., Ltd.; (d) chip bags Co., Ltd.; (c) chip bags for packaging; and (d) Appointers Co., Ltd., Ltd.: (d) Pour Co., Ltd.; (e) Pour Co., Ltd.; and (e) Selection He Co., Ltd. (mutual Ma) Pour and Baru; and (e) the obligation to pay for the unpaid goods to the Plaintiff and Selections as listed below.

The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) (Appointed Party) on October 31, 2013, the amount of goods unpaid at the end of the transaction, Inc., Ltd., Dussia Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., the 29,950,000 of the 29,950,000 of the September 13, 2013, Seoul High Court Decision 31, Sept. 30, 2013; 2,478,620 of the 2,478,620 of the 313th 31, 2013, the amount of goods unpaid at the end of the transaction, shall be 42,754,974, Sept. 15, 2013, H. 30,42,643,50 of the 2013, Sept. 21, 2013

C. The network G died on March 17, 2013, and Defendant A is the wife of the network G, and Defendant B, C, D, E, and F are the children of the network G.

On January 3, 2014, Defendants A, E, and F filed an appeal for a limited approval of inheritance, with the adjudication that each of the reports on the qualified acceptance was accepted by the Central Government District Court Decision No. 2013-Ma1584, Defendant B, C, and D as the High Government District Court Decision No. 2014-Ma1167 on November 17, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Eul No. 3-1, purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition as to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party)’s claim, the Defendants may claim against the Defendants on the attached list within the scope of the property inherited from the network G to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties.