1. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties E, and F, and the Defendant B shall be KRW 4,285,714, respectively, and the Defendant C shall be KRW 2,857,143, respectively, and the Defendant D shall be.

1. In full view of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 1 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff (appointed party; hereinafter "the plaintiff") and the remaining designated parties filed a lawsuit for the claim of penalty with Eul, and sentenced on February 4, 2005 to the judgment that "G shall pay to the plaintiff and the remaining designated parties 10,000 won, and 20% interest per annum from November 12, 2004 to the day of full payment." After the judgment, G died on March 6, 2013. The fact that the plaintiff (appointed party; hereinafter "the plaintiff") and the remaining designated parties were inherited at the ratio of 2/7, respectively, and that "G shall pay to the plaintiff and the remaining designated parties 10,000 won and 20% interest per annum from November 12, 2004 to the day of full payment." The judgment below was finalized, and that the plaintiff Eul and the remaining designated parties were found to have been approved by the inheritance support court No. 2141514.217, Nov. 217, 2014, 20141.

According to the above facts, the defendants are obligated to pay the money stated in each order to the plaintiff and the remaining designated persons seeking the extension of the extinctive prescription of the above judgment, and each payment is within the scope of the inherited property from the network G.

2. According to the conclusion, the claims of the plaintiff and the remaining designated parties are justified.