beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for one year, for Defendant B.
, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 19, 2014, Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. at the Daegu District Court on November 21, 2014, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Daegu District Court on February 23, 2018, and on August 27, 2018, Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor and eight months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Daegu District Court on February 23, 2018.
The Defendants, “2018 Go-Ma3971,” using the personal identification card of Defendant A, who was a cohabitant, and a passbook connected to the D bank account, agreed to obtain C’s consent without C’s consent, and concluded that Defendant E would have divided the amount of the disposition by receiving the massage, etc. from the victim and disposing of it in the telecom, etc.
1. Defendant A, around November 24, 2016, notified Defendant B of the aforementioned C’s resident registration number and D bank account number, etc. on the date, Defendant B used the said C’s personal information to access the E office located in the 7th floor of the building in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and used the said C’s personal information to the E office, and used the said C’s personal information in the “C” and the “B” and the address column to enter the said file into the “D Bank H” in the “B” column of the new customer name of the said C, which is the prior recording of the rights and obligations of the said C, for the purpose of causing the work to be performed. From the same point of view, Defendant B used the said file by transmitting it to the manager of E (the State) who was aware of the said fact at the above location, and each of the said files was recorded in the “C” column of the said name, and each of the said files was recorded in the 15th page of the said crimes.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to exercise their rights and obligations and file a siren contract which is a preliminary record.