logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2020.03.05 2020고단46
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On July 19, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for general car and fire prevention, etc. at the Busan District Court. On June 29, 2018, the Defendant was released on June 29, 2018 during the execution of the sentence, and the parole period passed on August 28, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 16:18 on December 27, 2019, the Defendant reported to the effect that “a person is dead of a doctor of a hospital” in 119 under the influence of alcohol in the Defendant’s residence located in the Hadong-gun, Hadong-gun, Hadong-gun, and the police box affiliated with the police box of the Gyeongnam-dong Police Station was dispatched to the police station upon the request of 119 members.

At around 17:05 on the same day, the defendant's parking of FOtobb in front of his residence, and the above E was sniffly snife in the defendant's entrance, was inaccurate, and there was considerable reason to recognize that the pedestrian driven a Otobbb while under the influence of alcohol, such as a remote distance, and requested the defendant to comply with a drinking test by inserting the Obbbbbol in a manner of inserting the Obol. However, the defendant refused it, the defendant did not comply with the above E's request for a drinking test, such as refusing it, gathering the living trees provided by the above E, and putting the opening fence on the floor of the defendant's side.

2. On December 27, 2019, the Defendant expressed that “The Defendant, at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) on December 17, 2019, expressed his/her desire to take a drinking test to the Defendant for the same reasons as stated in the foregoing paragraph (1), and made the face of the above E one time in drinking.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning traffic control by police officers and prevention of traffic hazards.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. The circumstantial statement of the driver, four copies including the suspect's oral statement, four copies such as the suspect's ozone photographs, the suspect's photograph A (CVD 1), the suspect's photographic image (DV 1), and the victim's photographic photo.

arrow