logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2013.10.11 2012가합100772
부당이득금
Text

1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs the amount corresponding to the "amount of discount" stated in the separate sheet for calculation of unjust enrichment and each of them.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. During Ansan-si, the Gu CI was designated and announced as a residential environment improvement district under the Act on Temporary Measures for the Improvement of Residential Environments at Low-Income Urban Areas on December 22, 1990.

B. The Korea National Housing Corporation (the Defendant did not take comprehensive account of the rights and obligations of the Korea National Housing Corporation on October 1, 2009; hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant”) was designated as the implementer of the residential environment improvement project in relation to the said district, and obtained approval of the housing construction project plan under Article 33 of the former Housing Construction Promotion Act on January 12, 1998, and decided to build a CJ apartment (hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment”) on the land in Ansan-si, to lease some of its households, and completed the said apartment 2,044 households around October 203.

The Defendant shall publicly announce the invitation of occupants of the instant apartment to be newly constructed to the residents in the area where the residential building, etc. was demolished due to the implementation of the residential environment improvement project before the completion of the instant apartment site (hereinafter “instant rental apartment”).

(C) public lease was made.

C. At the time of the public announcement of the recruitment of occupants, the Defendant: (a) 5 years after the month following the month in which the initial period of designation of occupancy in the housing for sale was included; (b) the standard for calculating the pre-sale conversion price shall be the average of the construction cost and the appraisal price under the Rental Housing Act; (c) Provided, That even in this case, the construction costs shall not exceed the amount calculated by deducting the depreciation costs during the rental period from the market price of the relevant housing calculated at the time of conversion in lots; and (d) the construction costs shall be determined by adding interest on

The plaintiffs, around June 200, with the defendant around June 200, are to each corresponding subparagraph in the separate sheet for calculating unjust enrichment among the rental apartments in this case.

arrow