logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.04.21 2015고정1350
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant has been employed by art writers C as a lecturer by the victim C

D is a student of a culture and arts lifelong education center at a university.

1. No person who violates any provision of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc. shall defame any third person by disclosing false information via an information and communications network with intent to defame the person;

Nevertheless, on October 2014, the Defendant sent a conversation between E and Kakakao Stockholm at a place where it cannot be seen from around October 2014, on July 3, 2014, with six students, including the Defendant, and six students, at the head office located in Japan on July 3, 2014 at the time when he opened the sub-committee of the sub-committee.

I tried to clarify the act of self-defense.

During class, 20 women and 20 women who wish to see and dial-a-a-the-job were sent with words such as “I wish to do so” and “I wish to do so,” and sent words to E and F with a total of 4 times as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Form.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the complainant by openly pointing out false facts with the aim of slandering through information and communications networks.

2. The Defendant, at a place other than the instant G where it is unknown on October 2014, thereby impairing the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts, such as “the victim gets a sexual organ at the head office located in the day of the day-to-day 19:00 on July 3, 2014, when telephone conversations with the outside of the instant G, namely, “the victim gets a sexual organ at the end of the day-to-day she was going to the end of the day-to-day she was going to do so,”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and E;

1. The content of FKakao Stockholm dialogue, F and GKakao Stockholm dialogue, the complainant and E currency content, the complainant and the suspect Kakao Stockholm content, and other contents of the Kakao Stockholm dialogue;

1. Application of investigation report (E telephone communications) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow